Radar Detectors

Detectors and jammers are illegal in Ontario Canada. WRT tickets within municipal limits, jurisdictions around mine will usually reduce a first offense to a non-moving violation, but you have to show up in person. Also true for Mississuaga Ontario.

Before purchasing a radar detector, you should check your automotive insurance policy. I have State Farm Insurance (in Colorado) and they reserve the right to revoke your policy if you are using a radar detector. Their reasoning is that buy owning/uisng a radar detector, you are intending to break the law. If you are intending to break the law, they (the insurance company) does not have to insure you.

EDITOR'S NOTE: Yes, some insurance companies will refuse coverage if you have a radar detector. But oh, the irony... they donate radar and laser guns to the police all the time, hoping to increase the number of speeding tickets and justify raising the rates of their customers.

You can argue that they do it to help the police catch bad drivers, but that rings hollow to me.

You are doing a dis-service by advising people to use jamming devices, unless you are Federally licensed, these are illegal and you could face a Federal charge from the FCC. As for the "anti-reflective" devices, they are also illegal, at least in Wisconsin. (Anything that covers lights or license plates.)
As a retired traffic cop of 29 years, I have found that most of the speeders I stopped had radar detectors and they automatically got citations because the detector shows an "intent" to break the law. Many of the violators thought they were protected by the detector and drove at much faster speeds thereby considerably reducing their reaction time to slow down. I have never come across a radar detector able to live up to it's advertising hype that I wasn't able to get a good clocking on in numerous tests. Any good traffic cop worth his salt will still be able to clock any type of detector. They are just a waste of money.
My favorite tool was a speed computer called VASCAR. It was a visual determination of the average speed between two points timed by a clock down to 1/10'000th of a second. It doesn't broadcast a signal, therefore, can't be detected. In the words of one Judge to a defendant - "you know, there is no defense against this."

Why do you need radar? Coopertown, TN! They recently made the news because the Mayor (Boss Hogg?)refused a check that a speeder had written "For Speed Trap" in the memo field. This little town gets 30%+ of it's revenue thru speeding tickets. They change the speed limits weekly just to catch speeders. They have been hiring more and more cops (Roscoe P. Coltrane, Enos and Deputy Fife?) just to increase revenues. New Rome, Ohio was disolved by the state for getting ALL of their revenues this way. The "town" of 23 had 8 police officers. Vandalia, Mo. lost their police charter for the same thing.

Wes, do they let you have the bullet in your gun or only in your shirt pocket?

Fred Roller: VASCAR isn't foolproof. It's a "guestimation" device. I am "guessing" that car is crossing that bridge span now, etc.... They can be off by 10 miles per hour if the officers' depth of field is not perfect, or if the officer speeds up or slows down.

My father was a truck driver for many years and when the BIG black box became popular, "otherwise known as the FUZZBUSTER" all the truckers had em. It had 1 big red gem that went off when you were hit, sometimes it worked.. sometimes it didnt.As I got older and technology progressed so did the radar guns and the like so the results stayed the same. One thing I think people should keep in mind, if your flying down the road and your detector goes off, your still speeding until you reach the speed limit and by that point the officer may have your speed, a speed verse detection distance issue. In my state of Ohio there trying to push cameras and anti reflective products are illegal. Anymore I get a kick out of watching my father laugh when his NEW detector goes off with a local retail store door signal device sets off a signal in which the detectors of TODAY will catch. Wonder if retail stores know this to make you slow down in front off them, interesting advertising ? BTW Officers have to be liscenced in states to do traffic, they go to school to use the "guns", and radar detector tricks are taught. :-)

Lively discussion. I think I'm the only guy on the Eastern Seaboard who obeys the speed limit, whether the road be highway or local/rural. I agree with the comment above that it's much more relaxing and just as effecient time wise, it's also obviously safer.
I keep to the right (unless passing a true slow poke) and use my cruise control whenever possible.
That said, I too have gotten speeding tickets. It's maddening when it happens, especially knowing that 95% of the other drivers on the road are all passing me. Revenue? You bet you're bippy !! (The Police must think we're all stupid.)
I'm not sure that radar detectors are the answer though, and speed averaging (as described above) smacks a bit too much of Big Brother for my tastes. I suppose the bottom line is; if you drive a vehicle, sooner or later the man is gonna getcha.. It's just part of the cost of doing business.

I drive over the limit a lot, and I've had radar detectors since they came on the market. Since most of my driving is in a major metro area, I've found that over the years I've had excellent results with relatively inexpensive radar detectors. Frankly, I can't remember a single time that my radar detector didn't save me from a ticket. My current detector is maybe 5 or more years old, and cost less than $50. It does have all three bands, and it seems to be giving me 360 degree protection. So, in my driving area, a cheap detector does the job. If I did a lot of cross country driving, I might feel different. And since I drive a Corvette, and have been for many years, and haven't had a speeding ticket in maybe 10 years, I'm happy with a cheaper device.

Here's another reason why radar detectors are a good idea... On most superhighways the speed limit is 65, but if you travel at 65, you'll get run over. People generally go about 75 -- right past the cops with radar guns -- and the cops don't even care. Except for that once in a while, when they have to make their quota (oops, I mean "performance goal") and they'll zap you for going 68. Radar detection gives you the chance to slow down from 75 to 65 in a few seconds and avoid the off-chance that the officer is having a bad day.

I forgot to mention, in my previous utterance above, that if Law Enforcement was really interested in enforcing the speed limits, the Police could easily have a field day.
If the posted speed is 65MPH, most people (at least where I live - S.E. Pennsylvania) will do 75, or even 85. Catching speeders would be like shooting fish in a barrel. But the police DO NOT enforce speed restrictions, and the result is that everyone speeds. "Enforcement" (for want of a better term) is completely random and arbitrary. Result? Speed laws are not respected, and neither are those charged with enforcing them.

At the other end of the spectrum, the street I live on is posted as a 25MPH zone, but because it's a through street, most drivers feel they have the right to do 40. Since a large portion of it is downhill in one direction, I have to keep my foot on the brake for over a mile to keep it under 30. I have had impatient drivers behind me cross a double yellow line in order to pass me. Now, 30 or 35MPH would be a more reasonable speed for this particular street but the local cops use it near the end of almost every month as a sort of combination 'speed trap/revenue generator', and since I must use the road several times each day, I pay attention to the posted speed for the obvious reasons.
If the Police want the respect of those of us who pay their salaries, then they need to set reasonable speed limits and then enforce those limits. If they did so, at the end of the day, the revenue stream would likely remain unchanged, they would have our respect, we'd all have safer streets and highways, and Radar detectors would not be necessary.