Are the Bad Guys Winning the Malware Wars? - Comments Page 2
Posted by:
|
I personally use SecureAPlus which is also a white listing anti-virus, but it's free unlike PCMatic. SecureAPlus runs all unknown/suspicious files through Jotti, which is like VirusTotal and I get the results in seconds. Forget waiting 24 hours to see if a file is safe. The only issue I have with SecureAPlus is it does take some attention to verify whether or not files are harmful, but if you can get past that it's a great product IMHO. |
Posted by:
|
I have Bitdefender, Malwarebytes, SuperAntispyware, CCleaner, ASC10 (all Professional versions) which all run compatibly. Scheduled scans daily and I haven't had a virus alert for over 5 years,Only PUPs. |
Posted by:
|
How do you know which software is really a friend? Many features of common anti-malware software look to me like malware ... (!) including nag-ware, silly-popup panicware, secret-renewalware, and stealth-ware installs ... these are not a good sign that you should entrust your PC to these guys. As a computer community ... I would like to work our way some day to "honestware" that never has none of these issues, and treats paying customers like clients, not stooges. Cheers to Bob for starting to clear the path. |
Posted by:
|
Odd that Symantec (Norton) isn't listed. |
Posted by:
|
I'm surprised the test didn't include the new Ransomfree from Cyberreason. That program is free, and seems to be very, very good. |
Posted by:
|
Bob - you know that I am one of your ardent fans. EDITOR'S NOTE: I'm not here to promote or defend PC Matic. My article was meant to highlight the fact that most AV programs are failing at proactive detection, and that PC Matic is apparently the only one that's not. Please see my other replies to commenters. |
Posted by:
|
@Wayne Lindsey. |
Posted by:
|
Another poorly researched article. The AV test itself was presented by you incorrectly. Are you trying to sell PC Matic? How come you say you won't answer emails if they have grammatical errors, but your articles are filled with comma splices, run-on sentences, and seem to have problems with verb agreement. That being said, you're the quintessential sesquipedalian. It's no wonder people get confused about all the trickery and malicious software on the Internet, when people like you, who should know better, publish misinformation like this. EDITOR'S NOTE: Okay, so I write in a conversational tone, and occasionally flout the rules of grammar. A wise man once said "Freedom of the press belongs to those who own one." I apply that to my blog, and sometimes I'll even throw an apostrophe in "it's" when it doesn't belong. I know the rules, but it just looks pretty sometimes. :-) As for my poor research, incorrect presentation, and misinformation, you present no specifics. So we'll have to agree to disagree. Have a nice day. |
Posted by:
|
Been using PCMatic (paid, lifetime version) for quite a few years. I have it on two xp pcs and three win7 pcs. NO issues - EVER. - |
Posted by:
|
What are the arguments against PC Matic some commenters are hinting at ? Not being argumentative or taking sides. Just genuinely curious. |
Posted by:
|
And another question : from what I understand, PC Matic is a whitelisting product (therefore completely different from other anti-virus). Whitelisting is supposed to be a very efficient anti-malware technique, but possibly difficult to implement or use. Does anybody know of other reliable whitelisting programs, preferably free ? Sorry to come across as a pauper. |
Posted by:
|
Bob, I am getting sick and tired of you guys preaching about PCMatic. Seems that you and your associates are getting paid to tout how great this product is to the masses. I have used Bitdefender for many years now with great success and with no issues whatsoever. Besides there are many great programs available, I am just getting fed up hearing the same old song and dance about PCMatic, seems like overkill to me. I have over the past 25 years tried most of the big dogs and keep coming back to Bitdefender because of their pricing and great service. Cheers. |
Posted by:
|
Bob and other commenters, |
Posted by:
|
The more that I see the lab results --- which don't always entirely agree with each other, anyway --- the more I wonder just how "real world" their findings are. I've used Norton for years, with Malwarebytes as an on-demand scanner, and have had no problems at all online --- literally none. My brother has surfed safely for years using various free AV software and MWB. And I can't recall my sister (who I think uses McAfee) ever complaining of her system being down by malicious software. I'm not claiming for a moment that the labs' conclusions are useless; they're not. But a person shouldn't automatically be worried if his/her security software isn't at the top of the lab ratings, either. |
Posted by:
|
I have used Norton, Avast, and many others. I started to use PC Matic 3 years ago and have not had one problem. I find no reason to change. Thanks Bob for all your wonderful articles you put out. |
Read the article that everyone's commenting on.
To post a comment on "Are the Bad Guys Winning the Malware Wars?"
please return to that article.
Need More Help? Try the AskBobRankin Updates Newsletter. It's Free! |
Prev Article: Geekly Update - 01 February 2017 |
|
Next Article: Avoiding Online Tax Scams |
Link to this article from your site or blog. Just copy and paste from this box: |
Free Tech Support -- Ask Bob Rankin Subscribe to AskBobRankin Updates: Free Newsletter About Us Privacy Policy RSS/XML |
(Read the article: Are the Bad Guys Winning the Malware Wars?)