The Truth About Community Standards on Facebook - Comments Page 2
Posted by:
|
People need to find something to do with their time other than Twitter and Facebook. Facebook and Twitter are beyond boring. |
Posted by:
|
Well, I respect your feelings regarding the death threats by cowards to that girl. Very fine. But, what made you write this : "...Albert Einstein and Mahatma Gandhi will continue to foul your news feed with their cloying idiocy..." These two people do deserve respect (of their thoughts) and calling them idiots is not what I would appreciate. EDITOR'S NOTE: I wasn't calling Einstein or Gandhi idiots. I was referring to the usually insipid "inspirational quotables" genre shared on social media, often alongsided photos of people who never said those things. |
Posted by:
|
Interesting analysis - this reminds me of the BBC here in the UK. Is there scope for 'moderator analysis'? It might be quite entertaining - just what is it that makes someone so sure that they know what's 'balanced' (a bbc responsibility) or 'fair'? Better perhaps to err on the liberal side - as long as the vitriol throwers are identified. |
Posted by:
|
This is nothing new. They also had a Cliven Bundy Must Die, Obama Must Die, Harry Reid Must Die, and at that time the same uproar. It was then explained that it was a scientific fact that everyone must die. |
Posted by:
|
They have refused to consider other movements to pull down pages saying "kill whoever" even those that go about posting home addresses of those the page creator despises. Community Standards seem to be randomly enforced. A person can be chastised for saying something without being allowed a chance to appeal the decision, yet pages threatening harm are allowed free rein until they become viral or make the news. |
Posted by:
|
I noticed the same attitude at other sites, as long as we are happy, so is everyone. Or so they think. Remove, and be happy. I will never join Facebook. Google chasing me for advertising dollars is more than my nerves can handle. |
Posted by:
|
Personally, I hope Facebook crashes and burns and the sooner, the better. |
Posted by:
|
I suppose you think I am a racist also Dan Crawford because I believe President Obama is incompetent and and leftist President. People like you find it real easy to use the race card when you can't defend lousy president. |
Posted by:
|
Your analysis is dead-on. All the verbiage about "community standards" (they don't even have the guts to say "Facebook standards") is about keeping the herd quiet. |
Posted by:
|
Thanks,Bob. I just posted this to my Facebook page. |
Posted by:
|
Perhaps it is just old age, but I always thot that FB was on the complex side. I am always getting emails saying that I've got notifications, messages, pokes, jokes, and hoax. And when I click on the link, there's this big gamish (thank you, Spell Czech. Practicing for Halloween?) of stuff that appears to be unrelated to the content of the email that I received. Are the people who are outraged really the ones that are manipulated 23.5/7? |
Posted by:
|
I appreciate the info, and why, even though I do have an account, I do not post habitually. I also appreciate others comments and insight that make your articles that much more fun, 146% smarter than the rest, and why we need good folks like you. Thanks! |
Posted by:
|
I use FaceBook and I find some of the comments written here on Ask Bob Rankin about Facebook users kinda like what I would expect from some of the idiots that filter their way into my feeds on Facebook which I then unclick notifications on. |
Posted by:
|
|
Posted by:
|
|
Posted by:
|
I'm running into a lot of people who say, "Yeah, I have a Facebook page but I rarely look at it." Surprisingly, and unfortunately for Facebook, they're mostly young people. This is how MySpace died. |
Posted by:
|
I have enjoyed your articles for several years. You are current on lots of new technology. Is there any chance you could stick to that? If I want to read controversial opinions I can go to the news sites. EDITOR'S NOTE: Valerie, the article wasn't about the controversies. It was about how Facebook handles situations like this, and "shapes" your social media experiences. |
Posted by:
|
|
Posted by:
|
” I suppose that “we” refers to some low-level, anonymous moderator who probably wears a Greenpeace T-shirt." No, it goes higher in the organization than that. Given the known political affiliations of Zuckerberg and the other high mucky-mucks at FB, Instagram (which, IIRC, is now part of FB) & Twitter, I am utterly unsurprised that these vile attacks don't violate their community standards. Just another reason I have never had anything to do with any of those "services" and won't any time soon. |
Posted by:
|
With limited time to read all that pulls on me these days, I always try to read and appreciate your posts on so many issues. I am more and more staying off Facebook, b/c of the time it takes (I would rather be doing other things, like working in the yard or actually being with friends)and because of issues like this. So many people are so angry these days and looking for something to pounce on... sigh. Thank you so much for posting this, as well as all the more tech related posts. |
Read the article that everyone's commenting on.
To post a comment on "The Truth About Community Standards on Facebook"
please return to that article.
Need More Help? Try the AskBobRankin Updates Newsletter. It's Free! |
Prev Article: Old Androids Never Die, They Just Become Bots |
|
Next Article: What Is Google Plus Good For? |
Link to this article from your site or blog. Just copy and paste from this box: |
Free Tech Support -- Ask Bob Rankin Subscribe to AskBobRankin Updates: Free Newsletter About Us Privacy Policy RSS/XML |
(Read the article: The Truth About Community Standards on Facebook)