The New Google Voice: Love or Hate?

Category: Telephony

Google Voice recently got its first major update in five years, and it’s a mixed bag. The user interface is different, which always upsets some users. Will you love it or hate it? Let's take a look at what's new and different...

What's New in Google Voice?

The new user interface now looks like a mobile app: brightly colored icons and not much in the way of text labels. A little poking around quickly reveals how to navigate records of calls, text messages, and voicemails. “Send message…” appears prominently in the top left corner, and in several other places. Apparently, Google wants to encourage text messaging, which probably costs it next to nothing compared to voice calls.

On the plus side, everyone can now send photos via SMS message, even Sprint customers. That feature was missing in the previous (legacy) Google Voice. Google also notes that in the new version, “conversations stay in one continuous thread.” To some degree that was possible in the legacy version, but conversation threads are much cleaner and clearer now.

One big downside of the new Voice is that placing a voice call from the desktop is much more cumbersome, and in some cases, impossible. To call someone you've already talked to, first open the Google Voice tab for Calls or Voicemail. Click on a previous call or voicemail with the other person. At the BOTTOM right, click the link to call that person, then choose a linked number to use for the call.

The New Google Voice

If you have previously shared a text message with someone, placing a voice call to that person works just a bit differently. Open the Google Voice tab for Texts, and click on a previous conversation with the other person. At the TOP right, click the phone icon to call that person, then choose a linked number to use for the call.

So how do you call someone you haven't called or texted before? You can't! Google's help file says: "To call someone you haven’t called before, use your phone instead." Wow. The previous (legacy) version of Google Voice had a big red button labelled CALL. You could simply enter any number, and off you go. I can't figure why the smart people at Google would remove the ability to easily make a VOICE call in an application called Google VOICE.

Where Did it Go?

The “Search” function at the top of the new Voice interface searches the text of voicemails that have been converted to text, as well as text messages. However, it searches only one type of message at a time, not voicemails and text messages in one search. Call records can be searched by caller’s name only; you can’t find call records by searching for a phone number. In the old version of Voice, the History link pulled all your texts, calls and voice messages together on one screen.

The options for Archive, Mark as Spam, Block Number and Delete are still there, but you have to select a message, then click the three little dots on the right, just under your profile icon to find them. Google Voice settings are buried under the three dots that appear on the LEFT side of the screen. In my opinion, all of these things were easier to find in the old version.

But hey, that reminds me of my favorite feature of the new Google Voice. Click those three dots on the left, scroll down, and under Settings, you'll see the option for "Legacy Google Voice." Click that, and a new window will open with the familiar legacy version of Voice. That big red CALL button (the one that lets you call ANY number) will be there. You'll also regain another feature that's gone from the new version. The History link shows everything (texts, calls, and voicemails) on one screen.

Overall, this update appear pretty slap-dash, with most of the emphasis on mobile functions such as picture and text messaging. The UI tweaks align the desktop version with the mobile version of Google Voice, making programmers’ lives easier. And it's good to finally be able to send pictures in a text message.

Google now has three messaging apps: Google Voice, Hangouts, and Allo. Each has its pros and cons, and limitations. The instant-messaging app Allo, for instance, can’t send text messages or place voice calls; it’s not even available for desktop computers. Users are split up among the three apps, and switching from one to the other has a learning curve.

This fragmentation may be typical Google experimentation; throw some half-baked “beta” apps out there and see which one(s) people use most. But it’s very confusing and frustrating for many users. If Google wants to get serious about competing against Apple’s iMessage, it should integrate all calling and messaging functions into a single app.

Your thoughts on this topic are welcome. Post your comment or question below...

 
Ask Your Computer or Internet Question

  (Enter your question in the box above.)

It's Guaranteed to Make You Smarter...

AskBob Updates: Boost your Internet IQ & solve computer problems.
Get your FREE Subscription!


Email:

Check out other articles in this category:



Link to this article from your site or blog. Just copy and paste from this box:

This article was posted by on 9 Mar 2017


For Fun: Buy Bob a Snickers.

Prev Article:
Geekly Update - 05 March 2017

The Top Twenty
Next Article:
TEN Common Computing Mistakes (and How to Avoid Them)

Most recent comments on "The New Google Voice: Love or Hate?"

(See all 27 comments for this article.)

Posted by:

SueB
09 Mar 2017

Jumped to use Google Voice when first offered and even dropped my landline. I do not use a cell phone so Voice kept me connected. Then Hangouts; I never got the 'hang' of it. Now with the new Google Voice its best option IS the Legacy Google Voice. If Google is working on reducing their market share, they are headed in the right direct.


Posted by:

olamoree
09 Mar 2017

I have used GV for years, living in a foreign country when it was 1¢/minute, it was great! Then it went Free! I have not had the "New" GV installed... yet, but I have noticed during the past month that 98% of calls from the computer just don't go thru.. no ring, no message, just dumps the no-call after 45 seconds. I call a lot of different numbers (mostly to elected officials) but I notice that if the name/number isn't in my Contact List, it doesn't seem to save a record of that number called. GV was great and I hope it continues to be.... even if they put the 1¢/minute back on.


Posted by:

Michael Hawkins
09 Mar 2017

I think it's amusing and sad to watch companies get large and then wander towards entropy. I'm not seeing Google immune.
They have great products initially and then they collectively lose their mind. Products get complicated, opaque and head towards irrelevance. Android is much more complicated and harder to use - at least as a phone than the earlier releases. They drop Picasa in favor of some cloud based confusion. An as OP noted, Google Maps and now Google Voice. They need to hire ordinary people to Beta their products and listen to them.


Posted by:

BobD
09 Mar 2017

The sole use I make of the new Voice is to transfer to Legacy.
I am grateful to Google for the service, and they have a right to destroy it, though the cost to a large number of users would be embarrassing.


Posted by:

DanD
09 Mar 2017

Bob,

I cannot seem to find the "Legacy" button on my Googlevoice. After I hit the three dots, the only options that show up are: "People and Options; Archive; Mark as Spam; Block Number;" and "Delete." No "Legacy" shows up. As a result, I cannot call out to any new numbers, only the ones I already have.

What am I doing wrong?

DanD


Posted by:

RandiO
09 Mar 2017

Unfortunately, the feature to "send photos via SMS message" can only be achieved if the file resides on the cloud. I am finding out that such image files cannot be pasted from local device memory or drive.


Posted by:

DanD
09 Mar 2017

Bob,

I found the Legacy function.

DanD


Posted by:

PgmrDude
09 Mar 2017

Correction: 3rd paragraph from bottom:
"Overall, this update appear pretty slap-dash..."
should be:
"Overall, this update appearS pretty slap-dash..."


Posted by:

Larry8811
09 Mar 2017

Hate it. You best summarized it as "Overall, this update appear pretty slap-dash." Google must be taking lessons from the Windows 10 designers.

One function "old" Voice replaced by 3 functions: "new" Voice, Contacts, Hangout.

Fortunately I found the Legacy Voice.

There must have been a great hue and outcry about this update 'cause this morning (Mar09) I find that my link to the "new" Voice directs me to the "old" Voice.


Posted by:

Gary Matthews
09 Mar 2017

Good article, Bob, but a couple of things seem different in my iPhone version of the app. (1) I can't find any legacy option. Maybe this is an Android-only ability? (2) Tapping the dialer icon on the bottom row calls up a number keypad with which I can dial any number, including numbers I've never called before. Weird that this is in the iOS app but not Android, since Google owns the latter. But I just tried it to make sure, and it definitely works.

Maybe this is a new update that rolled out just add you were paying your article. It does seem like a bug, not a feature.


Posted by:

Jay R
10 Mar 2017

Google began as a song and went to pot.
Looks like a case of bard to voice.


Posted by:

Frank
10 Mar 2017

I HATE the new Google Voice. They took something that was already a challenge to use and made it worse. I am searching for a new app to use that doesn't involve switching between new and old and different apps just to make a call.
Any suggestions?


Posted by:

Dr. Moore
10 Mar 2017

Thankfully I navigated to Legacy in 30 seconds on day one of the new Google
voice. The new voice: an abomination.


Posted by:

BevHoward
10 Mar 2017

It's important to specify the GVoice platform when posting... both the desktop and phone interfaces are completely new.

The "legacy" option is only available in the desktop interface. It's not possible to revert the phone interface and, imho, it's worse than the new destop versions. In addition settings verbage has changed and can be misleading.


Posted by:

PeteFior
10 Mar 2017

I only use G-Voice for international contact. International texting was previously unavailable, so I wonder if that has been enabled in the "new" version. That would be "nice"!


Posted by:

CtPaul
10 Mar 2017

All of this is hogwash to me. If I need to contact a person I will call them. Sometimes I might e-mail them if I need a thoughtful reply and am not in a hurry for an answer. Anything else is simply b.s. (at least in my opinion.)


Posted by:

jmke
10 Mar 2017

Today, Friday, a day after you posted this article, on the Legacy page I don't find a "big red CALL button" - instead there's this:
Get a Voice number

When I click it, I get this message:

You can choose a brand new number from Google or use your existing mobile number to get the full set of Google Voice features, like:
one number that rings all your phones
online voicemail with transcriptions, sent to you by email or text
custom greetings and call blocking, and much more

Looking around their Help screens just confused me more. Have they linked Legacy back to the new Voice now and taken away the Call feature? I'm not sure how I made phone calls last year using Google Voice without a "special" phone number! My settings don't show any linked phones.

My friend and I gave up on Hangouts awhile back by switching to Skype which then kept dropping our calls (audio and/or video). So last time we used free Zoom after learning that one-to-one "conference calls" are free and unlimited in time (https://zoom.us/pricing)! Try it! (We use it on our desktops.)


Posted by:

Gary in SE Wisconsin
11 Mar 2017

Too many cooks spoil the broth - Et tu, Google? Remember the k.i.s.s principle!


Posted by:

Alex
10 Apr 2017

Hate the new interface. It's cumbersome and counter intuitive. I use the legacy setting each time I log in, but it's loading slower and any changes I make (like blocking and such, stick on a spinning cursor for a long time). I wish there was a way to lock the legacy interface in for good and use it exclusively without the need to constantly switch back to it. At least until Google pulls its head out and creates an interface worthy of the name, that is......


Posted by:

Elizabeth
24 May 2017

You have it right Gary in SE Wisconsin why would Google want to improve Voice when it was so simple to use the way it was especially for us Seniors how non understanding of all ages in the general public. Gary you r right the kiss principle so TRUE. GOOGLE WE R ALL NOT 21 YEARS OLD ANY MORE. We were not raised with this technology. Think of how it affects us Seniors.


There's more reader feedback... See all 27 comments for this article.

Post your Comments, Questions or Suggestions

*     *     (* = Required field)

    (Your email address will not be published)
(you may use HTML tags for style)

YES... spelling, punctuation, grammar and proper use of UPPER/lower case are important! And please limit your remarks to 3-4 paragraphs. If you want to see your comment posted, pay attention to these items.

All comments are previewed, and may be edited before posting.

NOTE: Please, post comments on this article ONLY.
If you want to ask a question click here.

Free Tech Support -- Ask Bob Rankin
RSS   Add to My Yahoo!   Feedburner Feed
Subscribe to AskBobRankin Updates: Free Newsletter
Copyright © 2005 - Bob Rankin - All Rights Reserved
Privacy Policy -- See my profile on Google.


Article information: AskBobRankin -- The New Google Voice: Love or Hate? (Posted: 9 Mar 2017)
Source: http://askbobrankin.com/the_new_google_voice_love_or_hate.html
Copyright © 2005 - Bob Rankin - All Rights Reserved