What's The Reason For Free Software? - Comments Page 1

Back in the early 90's, I used several shareware programms. One was Aseasyas 1-2-3, another was a word processing and mail merge and the 3rd was an accounting program. The cost originally was $5.00 per disk to payfor the disk and please send another $20.00 if you keep using it, which I did.
All 3 programs worked well and I missed them in later years. They were for a Dos 3 laptop which didn't have much HDD space or RAM. Happy days.

Chrome is free. Ccleaner is free. Malwarebytes is free. Many of us use free software, everyday. I am greatful to free software and the writers of it.

My thanks go out to the altruistic folks who design these wonderful programs and provide them free to folks like me.

When I use a program, like Office Libre or play good free games like Elvenar or Forge of Empires, I usually donate an amount to them that I consider reasonable. I do this just because I like to feel good about myself. "Myself" I say, "You are not a mooch."

Thanks to you, too, Bob. I follow you because sometime back my computer was doing something screwy (I don't remember what) that was beyond the casual reboot and required several steps. Your instructions were clear, concise, and covered the problem with all the side info I needed to do it right. (In other words, I didn't need a degree to understand you.) At 76, I do not want to become a computer guru; I'm happy to leave that to you.

Not exactly on topic, but since you mentioned Ubuntu, I'll add my suggestion to the discussion.

If you've ever wanted to try Linux, especially if you want to dual boot alongside Windows, you should checkout Q4OS. https://q4os.org/index.html

For sheer simplicity, they offer a Windows Setup that you run from within Windows. All you need to do during the setup is decide how much space to allocate on your hard drive and how much free software you want to install during the installation. It took me, as I recall, about 20-minutes to install the "complete" option. There's also a software finder/installer built-in so you can add more later, as well as an update manager that can notify you when there are updates available and will install them if you so choose.

One very nice thing the setup handles is peripheral hardware. It detected everything I have and set them up for me.

Also, you can customize the look and operation a lot! My Q4OS desktop looks and acts very much like Windows.

When booting your computer, it pauses to let you decide whether to start Windows or Q4OS. If you don't choose, it automatically starts Windows after about 10 seconds.

And, if you decide it's not for you, you can uninstall it just like any Windows program.

... and, it's free!

In any new field there is a lot of sharing. I remember the days of fixing lamp radios, then the early days of electronics. All sharing the enthusiasm for new ways of expressing productive and interesting creativity.
These domains of activity have become impossibly for profit and took away the fun by having industrial production eclipse the amateur.
With software creation there are no such limits. Any one can program anywhere with little investment.
So freeware will be for a long while yet, not taking into consideration academic projects.
Thanks Bob for bringing this nice human subject.

Any replacement for Photocopier Expert?

I tried LibreOffice and didn't care for it. I guess I have become so used to how Word and Excel do things that I had a hard time adapting to the way Libre did them. I'm back to using Office, although I am using an outdated version, 2010.

While some people enjoy creating software and distributing it for free, others make some money by embedded ads. Or by having ads on their website where you go to get the free software.

One of you comments was that Chrome is free. Not exactly. Google does do some tracking and other things so that they get some benefits from your Chrome use.

Just note:

Avast has been recently bought by Norton. (Which used to be Symantec, but who are now calling themselves 'NortonLifeLock.')

Audacity was bought by the Muse Group, which promptly changed the terms of service which some took as allowing spyware (tracking cookies anyone?) in the product.

The jury is still out whether these great products will remain accessible and free. Get 'em while they're hot!

-bb

Retail software developers are obligated to ensure the program works as intended (without additional configuration or bugs) in a standard environment and provide updates or upgrades for functionality.

Free software projects may end up being abandoned by the developer.

Here is one of the best altruisms:
OpenSource password-manager program called KeePass had the following at their masthead (2006/10/16): "Is it really free? >> Yes, KeePass is really free, and more than that: it is open-source (OSI certified). You can have a look at its full source and for example check if the encryption algorithms are implemented correctly."
"Perhaps you wonder why I decided to make it open-source. The answer is relatively simple: in my opinion all software that has something to do with security should be open-source. Here's a quote of Bruce Schneier that sums it up pretty good: “As a cryptography and computer security expert, I have never understood the current fuss about the open source software movement. In the cryptography world, we consider open source necessary for good security; we have for decades. Public security is always more secure than proprietary security. It's true for cryptographic algorithms, security protocols, and security source code. For us, open source isn't just a business model; it's smart engineering practice.”
Bruce Schneier, Crypto-Gram 1999/09/15 (http://www.schneier.com/crypto-gram-9909.html)

Google offers software and then stops supporting it, like Google gadgets and Picasa. Spend all that time on Picasa, and poof! It is gone. I bought an HP flat bed scanner and an HP multi use printer, including scanning a few years later. Poof! HP will not support either scanner with the needed software connection to Windows. The hardware of the devices still work, the printer still prints and photocopies, but no scanning. HP and Google are low on my list of trustworthy companies now. I have to shop flatbed scanner all over again, and if I buy a new computer, PC type, all that remains of Picasa albums and the Google gadget will fully disappear. Computers are more frustration with these failures of software being supported.

Hi Bob. Thank you for the article. Have you ever considered allowing readers to post some of their favorite free software?

I have used free AVG antivirus safely for many years and the comment above by RandiO "In the cryptography world, we consider open source necessary for good security;" gets it exactly right, I have always thought that by being free AVG gets access to a much wider range of "bad" stuff. Thanks for all the free advice that Bob has given us over the years, he ought to tell us why he does it, we all learn so much and great comments above in response

erfahren: True (about abandonment), but as Sarah L (above) points out so well, commercial products can be discontinued, too. If the product is open-source, another developer can take it up and continue it.

Sarah L: no guarantees, but it might be worth a look at open-source alternatives for your printer/scanner drivers. I don't know if you'll find one for Windows, but you may be able to run them under Linux - they have a lot of generic drivers that run most major printer brands.

Speaking of free...Bob, I want to thank you for doing what you do. I don't have a need for every one of your posts, but I do appreciate that you are a trusted individual that I can count on when I am in need. I know you have advertisers, but what you do for me is free to me :-)

Black Magic Design's free video editing software "Da Vinci Resolve" is really impressive.

https://www.blackmagicdesign.com/products/davinciresolve/

It occurs to me that a lot of free software probably does quite well from donations. Irfan Skiljan, for example. (Which reminds me that it's time to support Irfanview again. I don't know what I would do without it!)

I am now using Libre Office spreadsheets and I'm grateful for it. However, I find it far more complicated than I need and I wish they would develop a simpler version for us small-time users.

Interesting article, Bob. Thank you.

I choose Open Source Software for the very simple reason that it is very quickly fixed when a bug is found, unlike Commercial Software. I like using Windows 10 (and even 11), but I also enjoy working in KDE neon GNU/Linux. That distribution is the latest KDE software (from the KDE Desktop environment) running on top of an Ubuntu LTE base. With this distribution, I get the rock solid stability of the Ubuntu base combined with the very newest KDE components from KDE's stable tree. In other words, I get a cutting edge desktop running on a very solid and stable foundation, the best of both worlds.

As for Windows 11, I run it on my new laptop. It is very pretty, but beyond that, I do not see any compelling reason to switch from Windows 10. On the other hand, if a very pretty desktop is important to you, I see no compelling reason not to switch, although, if you choose to make the move, I strongly recommend that you wait until Microsoft offers the upgrade in Windows Update. From what I am hearing, there are a few issues with some hardware configurations that still need to be worked out, so Microsoft is holding back on offering the upgrade until they determine that your hardware is correctly supported.

I have used Microsoft products since MS-DOS 3.3. My first graphical desktop came from IBM. They offered a free (test) version of their OS2 desktop environment. It ran on top of the MS-DOS OS very nicely. Later I tried Windows 3.1. It was OK, but I soon returned to my OS2 desktop environment because it felt more like home. Then Microsoft released Windows 95. It also ran on top of a version of MS-DOS (one specifically designed for Win95). I liked it. It wasn't as klunky as Windows 3.1, and it felt a lot like OS2 to me. I have used most versions of Windows since then. There were a few stand-out bad versions that I wish Microsoft would have had the wisdom to bypass, but that was not to be.

I run Windows 10 on my production desktop PC, and I will continue to do so at least until Microsoft offers Windows 11, but I'm in no hurry. I'll deal with the upgrade decision when it is offered to me.

I have a laptop that will not meet the Windows 11 hardware requirements. It's CPU is too old, although it does have Secure Boot, and TPM2. I'm still working to fully understand the logic for that. On that laptop I run Windows 10 dual-booted with a Linux Distribution that mimics Windows 11, called fx-windows-11-preview. This is yet another distribution built on an Ubuntu base (very much like KDE neon) with a custom desktop environment that very accurately mimics Windows 11. This distribution is on it's second release preview, so I will hold any judgement for the final release, but from what I see so far, it is very interesting. Imagine a Windows 11 user interface built on top of a solid and stable Linux base. This is a very cool concept, and I like what I see so far.

Now back to my original comment. Open Source Software is inherently more secure than commercial software because millions of eyes look at the code daily to seek out any bugs or weaknesses, unlike commercial software (aka closed source software). With so many people looking at the code every day, bugs are found and fixed, usually in a period measured in days, not weeks or months. It is true that a few issues have been recently found in foundational Linux components, but once they have been found, they have been patched. The only thing users (either home users like me, or commercial users like websites) must do is keep their systems up to date.

The advantages of Open Source Software may be one very good reason that Microsoft has been open sourcing some of their software, in particular the .NET framework and .NET core. It makes sense to me that they would want these two foundational components to be as secure and bug-free as possible, and it cannot hurt that open-sourcing these components gives Microsoft a foothold in the Linux world, between .NET and wsl2. These efforts also may be targeted at keeping Microsoft relevant.

I do not believe that Microsoft is altruistic in any way, shape, or form. I think that what they are interested in is cutting their operational costs, increasing their overall profit, and generating a good public image. The combination of their open source initiatives, their Insiders Programs, and their offering of a largely free desktop environment speak to these efforts. I have no problem with Corporations (or companies) making a profit, and I applaud Microsoft's efforts, regardless of their motivation, because in the end, they do contribute to the common good.

My2Cents,

Ernie