[LEGAL?] Digital Snitching On Police - Comments Page 2

Retired from 30 years as an expert witness in many
injury cases where a local or state law was violated, I suggest you read those applicable to where you drive.
Search for "Interference with law enforcement."

For most of the 55 years I've been driving, I've fantacized about being able to get warnings of traffic accidents or slowdowns on my route, as well as warnings about hidden police and speed traps. (I didn't bother with radar detectors because they were of questionable value: If you were close enough and in the line-of-sight to detect the police radar, it was close enough to also detect you.)

Then Waze came along, and all my wishes were granted! Instead of checking a freeway map on my computer ahead of a trip to determine the best route, only to have conditions change while in transit due to accidents and jam-ups, Waze provides real-time information and up-to-the-minute recommendations for the fastest path to my destination. Furthermore, it provides extremely accurate estimates of arrival times. It helps me avoid wasting my time, and has undoubtedly saved me many hours and days over the course of each year.

The warnings about police, while not perfect, are generally accurate. There are many false positives (i.e., the police care is no longer there when you pass the indicated location, probably because it has already caught a speeder) but few false negatives. More importantly, it provides out-of-sight data instead of being limited to radar detectors' line-of-sight.

I've often thought that Waze should publish a study (which I'm sure they have lots of accumulated historical data for) showing how many total and per-vehicle hours are annually save because drivers are able to optimize their routes and avoid traffic jams. I suspect that the millions of Waze users have collectively saved tens of billions of dollars that governments would otherwise have had to spend on additional roads and freeway construction in order to provide the equivalent traffic carrying capacity. Localities which short-sightedly cry about lost revenue from drivers who avoid speed traps and other police harassment should instead consider the money they're saving on infrastructure upgrades due to Waze.

NYPD doesn't set up checkpoints to increase revenue, they are all about safety. Posting the location of speed enforcement details only encourages drivers to slow down until they pass it, then they're back up to 70 MPH and weaving in and out of traffic. Posting the location of DUI checkpoints encourages drunks to take a different route. The ones who get caught learn that they are not as sober as they thought after a six pack of beer and a half bottle of scotch. It should also be noted that radar detectors are illegal in many states (including NY) for the same reason. Drive safely and you won't have to worry about the checkpoints (or enforcement cameras for that matter).

Down here in Australia we do not have your luxury of a bill of rights (something that those of us with the capacity for free thought lament) however it was always the done thing to warn other road users of police presence with flashing of headlights - and they hated it and booked people for it (still do) - it is now nowhere near as common but I suppose on the flip side warnings are now available via gps and the like.
The pigs (unfortunately that applies to all too many down here) would rather make their 'quota' than have people modify their behaviour via non punitive means.

"excess fines shall not be imposed, nor shall cruel and unusual punishments inflicted"
it's absolutely unbelievable that SO MANY of you pretend to righteously defend the law while you SIMULTANEOUSLY show your blatant contempt for it. here in CA there are thousands of innocent motorists whose lives are permanently damaged or even destroyed every day by a criminal state and it's YOUR contempt for the rule of law that allows them to do it.

Right on, 𝐍𝐞𝐢𝐥 𝐢𝐧 𝐃𝐚𝐥𝐥𝐚𝐬, and our favorite Latin lurker, 𝐞𝐭 𝐚𝐥. ...
* * *
𝐓𝐨 𝐒𝐞𝐫𝐯𝐞 𝐚𝐧𝐝 𝐏𝐫𝐨𝐭𝐞𝐜𝐭 is quite a wide-ranging purpose; to the point where any action that can "reasonably" be determined 𝐭𝐨 𝐩𝐫𝐨𝐭𝐞𝐜𝐭 𝐚𝐧𝐝 𝐬𝐞𝐫𝐯𝐞 can be deemed reasonable for the police to perform in their daily routines.
In my pea-picking mind,
(𝒔𝒉𝒂𝒅𝒆𝒔 𝒐𝒇 𝑻𝒆𝒏𝒏𝒆𝒔𝒔𝒆𝒆 𝑬𝒓𝒏𝒊𝒆 𝑭𝒐𝒓𝒅 - 𝑳𝑶𝑳),
I think we should move to red, white, and blue...
𝐫𝐞𝐝 = stay below 20 (look two seconds ahead and ready to stop at any point)...
𝐰𝐡𝐢𝐭𝐞 = stay below below 50 (look two seconds ahead and adjust accordingly to conditions and traffic)...
𝐛𝐥𝐮𝐞 = (blue) sky is the limit (look two seconds ahead and let highway patrol pick your pieces).
* * *
Government control should never be the answer - although, I don't mind 𝙜𝙤𝙫𝙚𝙧𝙣𝙢𝙚𝙣𝙩 𝙖𝙙𝙫𝙞𝙘𝙚 in matters in which I have no real expertise...
𝐈 𝐚𝐥𝐰𝐚𝐲𝐬 𝐫𝐞𝐬𝐞𝐫𝐯𝐞 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐫𝐢𝐠𝐡𝐭 𝐧𝐨𝐭 𝐭𝐨 𝐭𝐚𝐤𝐞 𝐢𝐭...
(grin)
* * *
That's how freedom works, yes?

* * *
Until that time. . .

I hope you people realize that the cops are the ones mostly messing with the apps. They post a police ahead warning but they are not where they are supposed to be. They are much further up the road or on the other side of the road. The Highway Patrol boys in NYC and outer boroughs have a ball with this.

I used Waze for a short time, but went back to Google maps because Waze used too much mobile data. I like the traffic updates in Google Maps, but hope they don't force other features on me that use my data. I don't necessarily want to spend time in a sobriety checkpoint, but not because I drink, I don't. I don't care about speed traps because I stay with traffic, a little over the speed limit, but not passing the majority. I do care about accidents, lane closures, and other major tie ups. Waze allows you to keep tabs on friends' locations, which is fun, but again that uses a lot of data.

I see nothing to stop the police from "gaming" the system by reporting many speed-trap & DWI/DUI points to confuse the enemy (us car drivers!). If it made more motorists stick to the limit (or under) it could be considered a safety measure and if it car drivers ignored all the reported spots and got done for driving over the limit (speed or drugs/alcohol) they'd have regained their quota/income.

I don't think that they will do much about waze because if they ban that people can still go out & buy radar detectors or cb radios

You think these rinky dink tickets are a scam? How about cops who "arrest" your cash because it might be "drug" money? They take your cash and you hae to sue to get it back. These cops are nothing more than armed thugs.

You think these rinky dink tickets are a scam? How about cops who "arrest" your cash because it might be "drug" money? They take your cash and you hae to sue to get it back. These cops are nothing more than armed thugs.

I personally believe Waze is a great thing. I am a non drinker or drug user and have more than once been held up in a long line waiting to go through a DWI check point. What a waste of my valuable time!! One time it even made me late for work and my pay was docked.

Any means to throw a spanner in the works of police trying to entrap people is fine by me.

We have regular DUI checkpoints in my area. They are all paid for by a state fund that is supposed to do things to deter drunk driving. However these checkpoints are never set up to catch DUI's and they don't. They are geared to catch unlicenced immigrants via racial profiling. And they do.

We used CB radios in the 70's to verbally warn each other of speed traps. It seems to me that the crowdsourcing of the info is the same thing only higher tech - wouldn't it be protected free speech under the Constitution?

How many career criminals use these internet sites to evade law enforcement? As a professional law enforcement agent I have over 40 years of experience and in my earlier years I participated in numerous DWI / violation checkpoints. I have stopped and arrested some very evil criminals that otherwise would have been missed without that random stop, they usually do not violate traffic laws so as not to be stopped. I do understand the problem and do not agree with enhancing revenue by traffic violations, but having Google use this tool only helps the career criminal continue his trade.

they should attack the problem at the source! we got gps, speed limiters and other tech that could be utilized! instead of making weird obstacles or speed camera's etc. develop a box to limit speeding at location to be build into all vehicles no matter of age of the vehicle. then speeding is something of the past.

I'm a full-time Wazer but there's been a recent change in law where I live. I now limit my activity so as not to get caught holding my phone while driving. Was actually shocked on a recent visit to America, to find my driver openly using his phone for Waze and Google Maps, apparently with no fear of prosecution.