Which AntiVirus Has the Best (and Worst) Protection? - Comments Page 2

What about Advanced SystemCare with Antivirus 2013,do you have any views on this one Bob,it seems to do a lot,had it for some time now,no problems so far.

EDITOR'S NOTE: I'm pretty sure ASC 2013 uses the BitDefender A/V engine.

In 2010 Bob wrote an article about running multiple antivirus programs at the same time. It would be nice if AV-Comparatives and AV-TEST extended their testing to produce some rigorous results and see how well multiple packages "play together". Perhaps they could use their top picks (ADVANCED +) and pair them up. Performance (boot time) and other performance metrics (not just detection and removal) would be key factors.

My concern with what is best is that every year there is a best and worst, but I want to know what is most consistent over the years.
I've gone with half dozen over the years. I'm told there is better so I switch. money, money, money and dragging anchors.
Free programs dragged even worse until I settled on Microsoft SE. Now I'm told it sucks.

I always thought NOD32 was the best??

Hi Bob: Conspicuously absent from these tests is ESET NOD32 AntiVirus, a program that is very highly rated by experienced purchasers on NewEgg's web site. I have been using version 4 on two computers for over 6 months with outstanding results so far. Do you have any experience or comments about this application to share with us?

EDITOR'S NOTE: That's incorrect, ESET NOD32 was rated in the test. It just didn't do very well.

I have two:
1. there seems to be a correlation between the highest detection rates and false positives of viruses.
2. this is one tester's opinion, would you buy an expensive car based on a single report by an auto "expert"? Personally, I'm somewhat dismayed at MSE's poor performance, as it is the "default" protection for many users. Bob, you personally recommended Malwarebytes less than a year ago. Hmmmmnn.

EDITOR'S NOTE: I still recommend MBAM, but as a secondary on-demand scanner. I'm not sure if MBAM Pro is ready for prime time as a first line of defense, so I don't recommend it as such.

Bob is reporting the results of av-comparatives tets. He doesn't control what programs are tested. Go to av-comparatives.org for reasons why norton wasn't included in testing.

If you read AV-Comparatives methodology document (even though it may be out-of-date), it's up to the antivirus software vendor if they want to participate in the test. The tester (AV-Comparatives) also has the right to reject a vendor. They also limit their testing to 20 internationally recognized products. I would think that would qualify Symantec so it's not clear why they're not in the report.

Symantec is evaluated in the AV-TEST.org report of May-June/2012 for Windows 7.

I seen an old black & white western movie many years ago - I'm 70 - about a new doctor in town, who wasn't getting much business. So, he went about introducing non-fatal diseases in people's water wells and store-bought foods. It wasn't long until he had more business than he could handle. Since he knew what diseases his patients had it wasn't difficult to cure them. I have often wondered about all these antivirus software makers who may be "introducing" viruses in much the same manner. What a way to drum up some business. Just saying...

Scott: I agree with your grievance. Webroot was highly recommended on this site,previously; yet, it bombed in these tests. Who knows what to do???
Nezzar

I'm no pro ..... but anytime I meet someone who makes a living using computers, I love to ask them about their AV/Malware protection choices ...... AND just like most of these testing sites , " They are all over the map " .... My next door neighbor Is a IT Supervisor for for Emergency Medical Services ( in a large Metro Area ) he says " Norton " ..... I ask him about AVG and/or MSE .... He laughed , followed by , " Are you serious ? " .... but I use MSE on my NET Book ..... it's been clean as a whistle.

EDITOR'S NOTE: To a certain degree, it's a bit analagous to buying tires. If you buy the most expensive, highest-rated radial snow tires, but you never go out when the roads are bad, well then you probably won't have an accident. But was it those awesome tires that protected you? Same thing with anti-virus... if you never do anything but email and casual browsing on well-known sites, you're not likely to encounter the nasties that are lurking in some of the dark corners of the Web.

Why no Norton? Here you have it. A rep from AV-Comparatives sent me this link, explaining that Symantec refused to participate in the test.

http://forum.av-comparatives.org/index.php?page=Thread&threadID=1060&s=c0283cf16436553974fc0d54af799c507dc1eb6d

There's also a link to send comments to Symantec about their decision.

It's strange that Norton opted out of the AV-Comparatives' "File Detection Test" but DID participate in AV-TEST's May-June/2012 Windows 7 test which features: "Detection of a representative set of malware discovered in the last 2-3 months (AV-TEST reference set); Detection of widespread and prevalent malware (according to AV-TEST data)". I'm not sure if the two tests are equivalent.

I have nothing against Symantec. In fact, I've used it for several years without problems on my main computer. I did have a rootkit problem a few years back on a mini notebook I also have.

I agree with Bob: read the reports carefully and thoroughly and select the product that meets your specific situation. Be prepared to switch if your situation changes or a better product comes along.

Hi, I have been using Webroot and after reading your revue I uninstalled it and selected a free trial of Vipre. Your No 1 pick on the list. My system was completely locked down from the moment I tried to run a scan. After many hours I was able to do a system restore in safe mode to remove it. It would not uninstall or let me access control panel or anything. I have my webroot back now and my machine is running perfectly again. Do I now choose your pick no 2, or it that a problem too. Please advise.

I have been using the free version of Avast for several years with no major issues. I was intrigued by the superior performance ratings profiled in this report. After doing some additional checking I decided to purchase BidDefender 13 Total Security and installed it on 3 machines as allowed by the contract. It seems to work well, even impressively on the 2 32 bit Win7 machines. On my Win7 64bit I have had major issues. After booting it works fine for a while and then it will freeze my pc - not allowing any input - i.e. can't start new programs. I've put in a help request to Bitdefender - no reply as of sending late last night. This experience reminded me strongly of the old adage IF AIN'T BROKE DON'T FIX IT.

I was at Best Buy today looking at Win8 models and the salesman recommended WEBROOT! They were also selling Kasperksy.

He also said McAfee won't run on Win8 machines.

Today's NYT article explains why the deluge of new malware makes the AV guys fall behind faster than the 'bad guys' pump out more ..
1 million in 2000 and 49 million now..!!

http://www.nytimes.com/2013/01/01/technology/antivirus-makers-work-on-software-to-catch-malware-more-effectively.html?pagewanted=all&_r=0

A lot of these comments ask about Norton. Norton is a resource hog. It will slow a computer down and doesn't really work that well. I have a friend who was running Norton and told me one night that it had detected three viruses on his computer, but could not remove them. I asked him what they were and the next night he gave me a screen print of the message. I went to McAfee's website to see if they had manual removal instructions for them. I received a message saying that their current engine and data files would remove them. So, I told him that and set up a time to meet him at his house and took my old McAfee disk with me. I removed Norton and installed McAfee on his system. McAfee does a scan before it installs and my old disk detected all three and removed them. So he went to McAfee's website and bought the new version and updated the old one. McAfee is not a resource hog and does not slow the system down. I currently use Trend Small Business Client / Server and have no problems with it. I had to redo this system because Windows was messing up so I need to put MalwareBytes back on it, but it never found anything that Trend did not catch.