Are Premium Malware Suites Worth Their Price? - Comments Page 2
Posted by:
|
These AV Suites are not going to keep you safe, any of them. The only thing that will keep you safe is you! Don't do stupid stuff. Problem is: What is stupid stuff? A little common sense goes a long way, don't open email links (ever), don't go to questionable sites, don't open mail from someone you don't know, and don't click on every add that promises you something that is too good to be true. And please don't call that number that pops up and sez your computer is infected. Above all Microsoft is not going to call you! Bob |
Posted by:
|
Plus there's the advantage of not having their ads come up every time you start up. Personally, the best thing about Avast is their VPN service which I use here in Korea to access stuff in the States and to feel safer when using public hotspots. |
Posted by:
|
Plus there's the advantage of not having their ads come up every time you start up. Personally, the best thing about Avast is their VPN service which I use here in Korea to access stuff in the States and to feel safer when using public hotspots. |
Posted by:
|
Having used and been satisfied with Avast free for many years Avast is now really putting on the hard sell pressure by showing annoying popups (in my case) the "System Junk 6Gb" and "Broken Registry items 220" and showing all the programs slowing down our PC's etc, etc, can you tell us Bob if these problems highlighted by Avast are real? If so |
Posted by:
|
Mr. Rankin may not see any type of security/privacy issues with recommending GooglePublicDNS servers, but one irritating question still lingers in some users' minds about "Doesn't Google already know enough data on billions of users?". Wasn't the recent Facebook data-harvesting fiasco enough of a wake-up call, yet? I am not certain that putting 100% of our privacy/security in Google’s trust is truly advisable, no matter how much better all their 'free' offerings may be compared other available free firewall tools (e.g., OpenDNS, ComodoDNS, et al). Windows Defender Firewall may be truly "advanced" but the user must know there is an outbound connection being made by a process or a program (rogue or otherwise) in order to block/filter it. The lack of such a feature makes it a tool that is pretty much useless. Granted w/an alternative firewall (e.g., OpenDNS, ComodoDNS, et al), there would be a big learning curve both for the user and the firewall itself. Thus, such initial nag screens may drive some users bonkers. |
Posted by:
|
I've used Avast free for around 10 years and never had a problem. But it has become lately a bit of a nag and tried its various paid for bits like tune up and that is not bad but wont renew. I agree not worth paying for the lot. It is a left wing idea - that we cannot make our own decisions but have to be forced into it. Avast own AVG now too but no learn from comments they own CCleaner which I also use . |
Posted by:
|
Many interesting comments. One program that you have not discussed is PC Matic. I have used it for years and never had a problem. |
Read the article that everyone's commenting on.
To post a comment on "Are Premium Malware Suites Worth Their Price?"
please return to that article.
Need More Help? Try the AskBobRankin Updates Newsletter. It's Free! |
Prev Article: Geekly Update - 17 May 2018 |
|
Next Article: Everyone Knows Where You Are |
Link to this article from your site or blog. Just copy and paste from this box: |
Free Tech Support -- Ask Bob Rankin Subscribe to AskBobRankin Updates: Free Newsletter About Us Privacy Policy RSS/XML |
(Read the article: Are Premium Malware Suites Worth Their Price?)